Transition from development cooperation to broader forms of cooperation in Nepal : Comparisons, lessons learned and recommendations for policy and action
Dhital, Avinash; Sigdel, Uma; Shrestha, Uttam Babu (2022-04-26)
Dhital, Avinash
Sigdel, Uma
Shrestha, Uttam Babu
Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland
26.04.2022
Julkaisusarja:
Publications of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs 2022:3This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-281-373-2Tiivistelmä
The study was conducted to provide directions for Finland's long-term grant-based development cooperation towards new forms of partnerships in Nepal, in the wake of Nepal’s upcoming Least Development Country (LDC) graduation in 2026. Mixed methods, such as assessment of volumes of development assistance and bilateral trade between Finland and Nepal, were used for quantitative analysis, and interviews with 33 different stakeholders in Finland and Nepal, plus an in-depth document and article review, were carried out as a part of the qualitative analysis. Existing frameworks for comparative analyses, cross-cutting issues, a stakeholder’s assessment, and overall transition planning in bilateral development cooperation contexts were further discussed in the study.
It was found that Finland’s transition thinking in Nepal is relatively ahead of not only other developmental partners in Nepal but also of the Nepalese government’s own preparations for graduation. Therefore, it is recommended that Finland could lead Nepal's transition thinking, planning and execution together with other developmental partners, especially in thematic areas where it has a long history of cooperation and expertise in Nepal, such as in education, water, sanitation and hygiene, as well as in cross-cutting issues in gender, human rights and climate change. More opportunities for other forms of partnerships in these sectors could be forged through supporting active communication and dissemination of existing knowledge, practices, networks, success stories, and lessons learnt, for practical collaboration among stakeholders in Finland and Nepal, such as Finnish expatriates in Nepal, the Nepalese diaspora in Finland, Finnish civil society organisations, education institutions, and private entities.
It was found that Finland’s transition thinking in Nepal is relatively ahead of not only other developmental partners in Nepal but also of the Nepalese government’s own preparations for graduation. Therefore, it is recommended that Finland could lead Nepal's transition thinking, planning and execution together with other developmental partners, especially in thematic areas where it has a long history of cooperation and expertise in Nepal, such as in education, water, sanitation and hygiene, as well as in cross-cutting issues in gender, human rights and climate change. More opportunities for other forms of partnerships in these sectors could be forged through supporting active communication and dissemination of existing knowledge, practices, networks, success stories, and lessons learnt, for practical collaboration among stakeholders in Finland and Nepal, such as Finnish expatriates in Nepal, the Nepalese diaspora in Finland, Finnish civil society organisations, education institutions, and private entities.
Kuvaus
This report is commissioned as part of UniPID Development Policy Studies (UniPID DPS), funded by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland (MFA) and managed by the Finnish University Partnership for International Development (UniPID). UniPID is a network of Finnish universities established to strengthen universities’ global responsibility and collaboration with partners from the Global South, in support of sustainable development. The UniPID DPS instrument strengthens knowledge-based development policy by identifying the most suitable available researchers to respond to the timely knowledge needs of the MFA and by facilitating a framework for dialogue between researchers and ministry officials. The content of this report does not reflect the official opinion of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. The responsibility for the information and views expressed in the report lies entirely with the authors.